3 Pornographic films re-edited for mainstream release.Some simulated sex scenes are sufficiently realistic that critics mistakenly believe that they are real, such as the cunnilingus scene in the 2006 film Red Road. From the end of the 1970s until the late 1990s it was rare to see hardcore scenes in mainstream cinema, but this changed with the success of Lars von Trier's The Idiots (1998), which heralded a wave of art-house films with explicit content, such as Romance (1999), Baise-moi (2000), Intimacy (2001), Vincent Gallo's The Brown Bunny (2003), and Michael Winterbottom's 9 Songs (2004). The last of these films, Agent 69 Jensen i Skyttens tegn, was made in 1978. Notable examples include two of the eight Bedside-films and the six Zodiac-films from the 1970s, all of which were produced in Denmark and had many pornographic sex scenes, but were nevertheless considered mainstream films, all having mainstream casts and crews, and premiering in mainstream cinemas.
With movies such as Blue Movie by Andy Warhol, mainstream movies began pushing boundaries in terms of what was presented on screen. In the 1960s, social attitudes about sex began to shift, and sexually explicit films were decriminalized in many countries. Films showing explicit sexual activity were confined to privately distributed underground films, such as stag films or "porn loops". At one time in the United States such scenes were restricted by law and self-imposed industry standards such as the Motion Picture Production Code. Although it is ubiquitous in films intended as pornographic, it is very uncommon in other films. In the film industry, unsimulated sex is the presentation of sex scenes in which actors genuinely perform the depicted sex acts, rather than simulating them. ( Learn how and when to remove this template message) JSTOR ( January 2015) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message).Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. The 100 most common passwords are listed in a separate section these may not be used as passwords.This article needs additional citations for verification. They are not duplicated here for space and because Wikipedia:Password strength requirements currently uses the number 10,000, but checking them would not be a terrible idea. Lists of the top 100,000 and 1,000,000 passwords are also available from the OWASP project.
It may also be useful to browse the file to see how secure-looking a completely insecure password can appear. To use this list you can do a search within your browser (control-F or command-F) to see whether your password comes up, without transmitting your information over the Internet. "experienced" at 9975 and "doom" at 9983) hint this may not be a sorted list. The passwords were listed in a numerical order, but the blocks of entries and positions of some simpler entries (e.g. It represents the top 10,000 passwords from a list of 10 million compiled by Mark Burnett for other specific attribution see the readme file.
The OWASP project publishes its SecList software content as CC-by-SA 3.0 this page takes no position on whether the list data is subject to database copyright or public domain. This particular list originates from the OWASP SecLists Project ( ) and is copied from its content on GitHub ( ) to link it more conveniently from Wikipedia. The passwords may then be tried against any account online that can be linked to the first, to test for passwords reused on other sites. Usually passwords are not tried one-by-one against a system's secure server online instead a hacker might manage to gain access to a shadowed password file protected by a one-way encryption algorithm, then test each entry in a file like this to see whether its encrypted form matches what the server has on record. A hacker can use or generate files like this, which may readily be compiled from breaches of sites such as Ashley Madison. If your password is on this list of 10,000 most common passwords, you need a new password.